Monday, Mar 01st

Last update12:50:36 PM

You are here: Home CAREER Formal Sector THE FALL OF ANDREW MWENDA: How bribery turned a revered journalist into a vulgar propagandist

THE FALL OF ANDREW MWENDA: How bribery turned a revered journalist into a vulgar propagandist


In a letter published shortly after he was brutally murdered, Sri Lankan journalist Lasantha Wickrematunge said he was always ready to be killed for standing up for those too feeble to stand up for themselves. If there is any Ugandan journalist who claims to be similarly determined to die for freedom, it is Andrew Mujuni Mwenda.

But unlike his assassinated Sri Lankan counterpart, Mr. Mwenda has utterly failed to walk the talk. Mwenda has adulterated his journalism profession and degraded himself by choosing to speak for one of Africa’s bloodthirsty tyrants, a brutal tyrant whose government – like that of Mahinda Rajapaksa in Sri Lanka – has killed on a massive scale, murdered journalists, assassinated opposition politicians, incarcerated dissenters and applied every apparatus of repression to keep him, and his Tutsi oligarchy, in power.

Indeed, the military victory of Paul Kagame’s all-Tutsi Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF) 16 years ago turned Rwanda into one of the most dangerous places on earth. Some commentators hurriedly credited the RPF for ending the 1994 genocide that largely targeted ethnic Tutsis, ignoring and continuously ignoring an equally horrible genocide committed against ethnic Hutus by the new government. While the triumph of Kagame’s rebels ushered in relief for many Tutsis, it brought with it grave and continuing suffering for the majority Hutu population.

Kagame’s ‘counter-genocide’ force embarked on a slaughtering campaign, indiscriminately killing Hutu citizens and forcing millions into exile. About 1000 Hutu refugees were entering Burundi alone everyday for a period of months after Kagame seized power, according to Robert Krueger, the then US ambassador in Bujumbura. Approximately one million fled to Congo.
The RPF’s slaughtering campaign later extended to Congo where Hutu refugees – mostly children, women, the sick and elderly – were “bound and their throats were cut or they were killed by hammer blows to the head,” according to a recent UN Report.

After being heartlessly massacred by the RPF, the report continues, “Their bodies were then thrown into pits or doused with petrol and burned. The operation was carried out in a methodical manner and lasted at least one month.”

And yet, for killing tens of thousands of Hutus, the RPF – in the eyes of Andrew Mwenda – exercised unprecedented restraint! “What Kagame and RPF did in restraining themselves and their followers in the face of genocide in 1994 is a feat without precedent in human history,” wrote Andrew Mwenda in one of his articles that worship President Kagame.

Where is the restraint after slaughtering tens of thousands of Hutu civilians? Not only did they kill massively after their victory, the RPF played a significant role in bringing about the genocide that happened before their victory – the genocide against their Tutsi tribesmen. With the support of Washington which sought to establish a puppet regime in Kigali, Kagame’s RPA rebels waged a preventable war in the first place and then undermined every peace effort that would have ended fighting and avert genocide. Mahmood Mamdani puts it clear in The Politics of Naming: Genocide, Civil War, Insurgency:

…the US did intervene in Rwanda, through a proxy. That proxy was the RPF, backed up by entire units from the Uganda Army. The green light was given to the RPF, whose commanding officer, Paul Kagame, had recently returned from training in the US, just as it was lately given to the Ethiopian army in Somalia. Instead of using its resources and influence to bring about a political solution to the civil war, and then strengthen it, the US signalled to one of the parties (RPF) that it could pursue victory with impunity. This unilateralism was part of what led to the disaster (genocide), and that is the real lesson of Rwanda.

To praise the RPF for ending a genocide that it partly caused is a contradiction. To honour Kagame’s forces for exercising “unprecedented restraint” after slaughtering hundreds of thousands of Hutus is a shameless distortion of history. Asked by ambassador Krueger to share his knowledge of Kagame, a Scandinavian missionary who lived in Rwanda and Burundi for 30 years said, "Paul Kagame is one of the greatest murderers on the continent of Africa. There is blood all over his hands."

The agony of the Hutus did not end with the massacres they suffered at the hands of the RPF. 2000 Hutus, in the past three years, have been prosecuted for espousing “genocide ideology”, a ‘crime’ punishable by up to 25 years in prison.

Most of them, like leading opposition politician Victoire Ingabire, are harassed for simply stating that Hutus, not just Tutsis, were killed during the genocide and never officially remembered. The death of tens of thousands of Hutus at the hands of the RPF is not an opinion to be debated; it is a fact to be faced. But the RPF government wants it removed completely from history to escape prosecution and to cast Hutus as diabolical criminals who have never been victims.

Whereas Kagame’s brutality has been severest against Hutus, it has not spared his fellow Tutsis who disagree with him. Kagame’s top generals – with whom he murdered Hutus – are increasingly finding themselves in jail or in exile for simply disagreeing with him. Kayumba Nyamwasa, one such general who fled the country earlier this year, was pursued in his hideout in South Africa and shot in the stomach.

The aftermath the failed assassination revealed more of Kagame’s bloodlust. Jean Leonard Rugambage, a local journalist who blamed the shooting on Kagame’s government, was murdered at his home in Kigali. The newspaper Mr. Rugambage worked for, Umuvugizi, had earlier been closed for simply stating that two army officers, whom Kagame later sacked and incarcerated, had had a misunderstanding with the president.

Rugambage’s assassination was followed by the brutal murder of a leading opposition politician. The body of Andre Kagwa Rwisereka, the vice-president of another party that was prevented from registering and participating in the August elections, was found with his head nearly severed from his body. This is nothing short of a reign of terror.

Rwanda under Kagame is going through a reign of terror that may culminate in a disaster worse than the 1994 genocide. The relative economic growth that Kagame has achieved for the country cannot be enjoyed when the population lives in perpetual fear and journalists and politicians walk in the shadow of death.

The difference between Rwanda and other repressive states of North Korea and Burma rests only in their relations with the United States. While Korean and Burmese governments despise neocolonialism and thus face Western sanctions and hostile propaganda, Rwanda’s regime humbly licks the boots of the West and consequently secures the license to slaughter and torture its people with impunity. Gen. Kagame, like military dictators in Burma, wins presidential races in which he is practically the only runner.

If there is completely no basis to refute Kagame’s brutality, as we have seen, why then does Andrew Mwenda – previously known for his boldness in denouncing dictators – try to concoct an illusively beautiful image of the tyrant? The cause of Mwenda’s u-turn is not different from what impelled Tamale Mirundi to turnaround.

The only difference is that Mr. Mirundi, unlike Mr. Mwenda, honestly tells why he moved the goal posts. Mirundi publicly admits he changed from condemning to commending Museveni because he was given a fatty job of presidential press secretary. Mirundi has often challenged those who rebuke him for changing positions to feed his children before he resumes criticising Museveni. The same explanation applies to Mwenda’s disgraceful change of direction.

Mwenda gained nationwide fame for attacking Museveni’s nepotism and despotism. His criticism of foreign aid earned him international reverence and his arrests portrayed him as a freedom fighter. Indeed, Mwenda resigned from the Daily Monitor in 2007 because, in his own words, the newspaper had “betrayed the cause of liberty and freedom”.

“As for me, I can never betray the cause of liberty,” Mwenda vowed in his resignation letter. “Liberty is an ideal for which I am willing to live for, work for to see strengthened and if needs be, it is an ideal for which I am prepared to die.”

Time, however, has exposed the dishonesty that surrounded Mwenda’s oath. Mwenda – largely through his newsmagazine – has become a significant anti-liberty, anti-freedom force in Rwanda by justifying Kagame’s oppression. In return, his magazine has been rewarded with huge advertisement revenue by the murderous regime. It is this advertisement revenue that has reduced The Independent to Rwanda’s government newsletter and seriously undermined the credibility of Uganda’s once celebrated journalist.

The fact that advertisement revenue bribes journalists and undermines journalistic objectivity is well known in the practice of journalism. A profit-minded newspaper cannot attack or offend its advertisers but rather gives them the power to determine what to write and what to hide, a situation that media scholar Robert McChesney describes as “a hyper-commercial frenzy with little trace of public service”.

It is this hyper-commercial passion that has humbled Mwenda’s heart and soul to Kagame and reduced his journalistic mission to trivial pursuits of bread and butter. That is the lowest and the most contemptible state journalists can reach – those journalists who give up their intelligence and discerning faculties.

But Mwenda still has room to reform and relive a life of real meaning and noble purpose. He still has chance to learn from Mr. Wickrematunge – the journalist quoted in the intro – whom the murderous Sri Lankan government decided to shoot in the head last year after he had rejected its bribes and inducements to stop criticising it.

In his final letter Wickrematunge explained why he rejected such inducements and, instead, continued exposing the regime’s bloodlust even though he knew he would be eliminated for that. “Others, including political leaders on both sides, have at various times sought to induce me to take to politics, going so far as to offer me ministries of my choice,” he testified.

“But there is a calling that is yet above high office, fame, lucre (money) and security. It is the call of conscience.”

This story was first published in the print version of The Campus Journal in 2010


0 #1 Joseph 2014-11-18 12:48
Liah liah liah. No iota of truth in this article
+2 #2 Martin Owako 2014-11-20 11:58
I have equally seen and heard people comment about this U-turn by Andrew. My experience here is that authentic Journalists like Mr. Obore have been preferred by the public because they are seen as people who protect the interests of everyone without discrimination based on status, financial backgrounds, tribal or religious affiliations.

It is difficult to build the reputation Andrew Mwenda built and at the same time it is difficult to repair the lost trust now. People in opposition feel more affected by Mwenda's current style of analysis. However, I still like Mwenda's accurate analysis on political and economic issues but he should be seen trying to support the disadvantaged groups/people.
-3 #3 Denis Ssempijja 2014-11-20 13:35
there is no grain of truth in this article. General Paul kagame has streamlined Rwanda and is moving it from 3rd world to 1st world. Why is it that everyone is uncomfortable with him except the Rwandans currently living there and enjoying prosperity and moving away from dependency on the west??? Andrew Mwenda is very spot on and still accurate except on moral issues like homosexuality. so this article is rubbish.
0 #4 Ibrahim Muzungu 2014-12-13 14:08
Am very disappointed with Andrew mwenda bse is a person who used 2 inspire me
0 #5 eric 2015-02-19 05:22
despite the turn around,am still afan of Andrew Mwenda
0 #6 steven karanja B 2015-02-24 12:56
Am very disappointed with Andrew Mwenda because is a person who used to inspire me with facts and accurate analysis on political and economic issues. He is working for the same Gov't, what i would like to ask him did the regime change? Cause he used to say how he can never work with museveni?
0 #7 Agaba henry 2015-02-24 16:15
i think We as Ugandans don't deserve anything gd.
Why do we hate all the truth? That guy is spot on with everything he says, don't hate facts just appreciate his intelligence.
0 #8 Denis Male 2015-02-24 16:54
Ugandans Ugandans Ugandans... There is no clean Government (including Switzerland) and so I would not be concerned that he is a PR for Pres. Paul Kagame. Actually I would do the same if I had an opportunity.
0 #9 Alpha Nduhuura 2015-02-24 17:35
Still analysing but this article appears disappointing if the revelations are true!
+1 #10 Stephen Musamali 2015-02-24 18:23
Mwenda reports researched information most of us followed Rwanda's genocide and we know the actors and its still fresh in our minds as if the same happened yesterday.
-2 #11 Richard Muhumuza 2015-02-25 03:30
this is blackmail, I think we are all mature enough to differentiate water from milk. Just because Mwends does not speak to the interests of many especially propagandists on Uganda, he will always be labelled all sorts of things. But let's not for get that those are his opinions we can always counter urge him rather than blackmail him.
I believe he is by far a brilliant journalist, intelligent and quite analytical and that makes him unquestionably unique.

If this is what you are referring to as his fall ? I beg to say this is his key to success and you should pick a leaf
0 #12 Kagabo 2015-02-25 04:50
Quoting Denis Ssempijja:
there is no grain of truth in this article. General Paul kagame has streamlined Rwanda and is moving it from 3rd world to 1st world. Why is it that everyone is uncomfortable with him except the Rwandans currently living there and enjoying prosperity and moving away from dependency on the west??? Andrew Mwenda is very spot on and still accurate except on moral issues like homosexuality. so this article is rubbish.

Sir, I am Rwandan no way in 100 years are we going to become a first world.
-2 #13 Emma 2015-02-25 06:31
Apparently this newsletter or what, I don't even know what to call u guys (#campusjournal ),, is trying to build its name by attacking Andrew Mwenda,,, hahahah,,,kyokk a Ugandans,, I HV read many articles of urs on Andrew,, is this the strategy u came with,, poor u indeed!!
Rise and fall of Andrew,, then u talk abt RPF and Kagame,, in the whole thing,, guys get some brains!!,, find facts, change strategies, and ask Andrew who he did his rise,, or else go and grow cabbages,,!!
0 #14 Moses 2015-02-25 08:17
Successful revolutionaries are not martyrs! They always live to fight another day
0 #15 zac 2015-02-25 12:02
i believe PR is part of journalism,no offense wat i know its all abt maintaining the image of your employer. if its a job we leave the sentiments and act professionally. To me we separate the two from mwenda. i may not agree with him on some idealogies but to he has the stats which super exceeds other.
0 #16 Faustin 2015-08-02 08:05
Andrew Mwenda is known in Rwanda as a mercenary who serves Kagame without questioning, eveyone in Rwanda knows it, Mwenda is the loud speaker of P Kagame.
0 #17 simon 2015-08-02 21:04
Better give up yr name. I don't see a man in u
0 #18 simon 2015-08-02 21:05
Kagabo, Better give up yr name. I don't see a man in u
0 #19 bukenya b 2015-08-09 08:19
But wrong with us Africans u all know Kagame n m7 r dictators n yet dictators stay in power coz of blood n fell brothers first understand this.thevies get money but is stealing a job.Kagame leads bt it his background z bad n his bad period
0 #20 ALOYSIUS MULEKEZI 2015-12-17 12:09
In the article by Yahaya Seremba ,Andrew Menda is being blamed for nothing .He actually makes a true analysis of events and stuationFrankly speaking you know very well that truth hurts.Indeed the writer of the above article is hurt by the truth Andrew Mwenda says. For example his removal from NTV was caused by the analysis he made during FDC presidential candidate elections , he predicted that Muntu would loose to Kiiza Besigye miserably and it happened , and the analysis he made about Mbabazi was correct.i c.On the isssue mentioned that Andrew Mwenda supported President Paul Kagame you are too biased and very myopic..What Kagame has done for the country is very commendable ,first he has controlled the hatred between the Tuttsi and HUTUS Let us not mimitatie developed countries human right and democracy whokesale. They cabbot be applicable countries are too poor